The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill

Five ideas to cut political violence at its roots

Arizona delegate Stacy Goodman wears a 'bandage' on her ear on the third day of the Republican National Convention at the Fiserv Forum on July 17, 2024 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

The assassination attempt against former president Trump was a shocking inflection point in an already highly charged and emotional election cycle.  

We still don’t know the shooter’s motives. Since he is dead, we may never find out, but it could have been anything. We know, for example, that John Hinckley reportedly shot President Ronald Reagan in 1981 because he wanted to impress a celebrity, Jodie Foster.    

But the conversation around what happened in Butler, Pa., very quickly turned to the threat of politically motivated violence. It was already on the rise along with Americans’ support for violence as a political tactic, according to a recent poll.   

That’s appalling and totally unacceptable. And while calls to “lower the temperature” are important and welcome, we must be more specific about what that means. We have to do more as a society to reduce the risk of political violence, and here are five ways we can start.         

Appropriate authorities will also be conducting a thorough investigation to uncover any security lapses that might have contributed to the July 13 shooting.  

Meanwhile, some of the priorities outlined above can be advanced with legislation that’s pending right now. For instance, Congress needs to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act and the Freedom to Vote Act

Unfortunately, on others, we are actively backsliding. Gun safety is one: The Supreme Court’s disastrous ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen has paved the way for loosening firearms restrictions across the country.  

As Americans who treasure our freedom of speech and political dissent, we’ve always faced a balancing act. Healthy debate and political expression must continue, incitement to mayhem cannot. 

At the same time, the risk of violence can lead to censorship by overzealous authorities or self-censorship, out of fear. We can’t let that happen either.   

I pray that the aftermath of July 13 will be a renewed commitment to ending political violence. We know that with freedom comes responsibility. Let’s take concrete steps to make this country a safer place for the open and honest advocacy and debate that make our democracy stronger, or risk losing it all.    

Svante Myrick is president of People for the American Way.