Equilibrium & Sustainability

Equilibrium/Sustainability — Produce prices soar as California crops crumble 

California’s summer crops are shriveling amid ongoing drought conditions, putting pressure on grocery prices across the U.S.

Without rain or snow in central California and limited water supplies from the Colorado River, tomatoes and onions have wilted, while leafy greens grown in the winter face a dicey future, according to Reuters.

“There’s just not enough water to grow everything that we normally grow,” Don Cameron, president of the California State Board of Food and Agriculture, told the outlet.

Reuters reported that one Fresno County farmer planted just 25 percent of his 2,000 acres and harvested tomatoes two weeks early to minimize drought damage.

“I don’t think farming in California has ever been more complex and more challenging, and the drought is a large part of that,” the farmer said.

While California produces nearly a third of the world’s processing tomatoes, the U.S. Department of Agriculture cut its 2022 forecast down 10 percent from its previous estimates, Reuters reported.  

With fewer tomatoes — and onions and garlic — available, farmers were able to negotiate higher prices, which had led to increases to both produce processes and consumers downstream, according to Reuters.  

“The onions and garlic have already been negotiated for 2023, with another
25 percent increase in price,” Cameron told the outlet. 

Welcome to Equilibrium, a newsletter that tracks the growing global battle over the future of sustainability. We’re Saul Elbein and Sharon Udasin. Send us tips and feedback. Subscribe here.

Today we’ll start by exploring how a decision by some of the world’s largest oil producers to cut production has left Democrats quivering ahead of the midterms. Then we’ll see why global demand for biofuels poses a threat to food supplies.  

OPEC cuts leave Democrats vulnerable 

With the midterm elections rapidly approaching, a move by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to slash oil production has become a troublesome thorn in President Biden’s side.  

What happened with OPEC? Last week, the OPEC+ coalition of 13 member nations and 11 non-members — including Russia — declared it would reduce oil production by 2 million barrels.

This decision raised concerns that U.S. gasoline prices could soar, creating challenges for Democrats just a month ahead of the midterm elections, our colleague Rachel Frazin reported.  

Spotlight on an awkward visit: The OPEC decision, shepherded by Saudi Arabia, has set off a fresh tirade of criticism about Biden’s visit to the Kingdom this July, The Washington Post reported. 

Going too far: “I think America really shamed itself by doing that,” Hossein Askari, of George Washington University, told CNN, referring to Biden’s July appeal to Saudi Arabia Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, known by his initials MBS.

“Of course, MBS did not respond positively,” Askari continued. “But now he, in fact, has gone over the top. He has agreed within OPEC — and of course he’s the main spokesman in OPEC with Russia — that they will cut back.”

Bad news for Democrats: While fuel prices are part of a global marketplace and are mostly outside the president’s control, Republicans will likely use the situation to appeal to voters who are fed up with high costs, Frazin reported for The Hill. 

What can the US do? Askari suggested that the U.S. be “much tougher with Saudi Arabia,” stressing that America has “bent over backward to accommodate them in every way,” according to CNN. 

“Some people think that OPEC decisions are purely economic,” Askari told CNN. “Some people think purely political. It has always been both, especially for Saudi Arabia.” 

Oil cuts for weapon cuts: Two Democratic lawmakers have proposed halting arms sales to Saudi Arabia in response to oil production cuts from OPEC.

Financial implications: Also on Sunday, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned that the OPEC decision could hurt the global economy and that developing countries could especially struggle.

Biofuel demand ups food prices, political risk

Rising demand for plant-based fuels are driving up food prices around the world, leading to political risks for nations from Indonesia to the United States. 

Global price increases aren’t yet critical, but in regions like southeast Asia, rising prices at markets and restaurants are starting to become a political problem, according to commodities strategist Walter Kunisch. 

Interest in renewables: Both the EU and the U.S. are positioning plant-based fuels as major components of their renewable energy programs — and the market is responding by building new plants and buying up new feedstocks.

California is a dramatic case: The Golden State’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard has helped drive a wave of investment to convert fossil fuel refineries into biofuel refineries, Kunisch told Equilibrium.

But the new and continued federal subsidies — in addition to a growing corporate embrace of ethanol as a climate solution — helps to shift the calculus back in favor biofuels. 

ETHANOL DEPENDENCE MEANS LONG-TERM RISKS

Whether ethanol is truly beneficial to the climate remains a subject of ongoing dispute. Meanwhile, the fuel contains only about two-thirds as much energy per gallon as gasoline, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. 

Home-front benefits: What ethanol production does do very effectively, however, is keep the U.S. corn sector afloat, Kunisch said.

Long-term liability: That dependence on ethanol puts farmers in a serious long-term bind — because internal combustion engine cars are going away, Kunisch said. 

An unseen risk: This threatens to drop the bottom out of the ethanol market within the next decade or so — something farm country isn’t prepared for, Kunisch said. 

“That’s going to be a real shock to us,” he added. “And honestly, I don’t think anybody’s talking about that right now.”

Start now to avoid next COVID-19: scientists 

Meeting the growing risk of emerging infectious diseases like COVID-19 requires a more comprehensive and hands-on view of public health, according to a global team of public health researchers.  

Staying vigilant: COVID-19 is unlikely to be the world’s last serious pandemic — particularly if we do not prepare, the researchers argue in a new essay in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 

Avoiding the next pandemic: The researchers identified three urgent targets to help head off or at least mitigate the next pandemic:

  1. Guard the gates: The scientists urged “smart surveillance” of domestic populations that live near wild ones, which can be critical “interfaces” between humans and wild diseases.
  2. Conduct proactive research: Research into coronavirus vaccines was notoriously underfunded before the COVID-19 pandemic. To avoid a repeat of this situation, the researchers urged public health officials to monitor emerging disease threats and develop vaccines and treatments early.
  3. Reduce risks: Finally, the researchers pressed public health officials to identify the drivers that cause spillover disease — like human conversion of forests to farmland or the transport of live wildlife from forests into cities. Taking steps to reduce these drivers before the next big one is difficult — but will ultimately save money and lives, they argued.

Modification Monday: Animal edition 

Climate change pushes primates to forest floors, unlikely animals come together and frogs find thrive in new habitats.  

Human-caused climate change pushes primates from trees 

The mysterious world of animal hybrids 

A housing plan to stop frog decline 

Please visit The Hill’s Sustainability section online for the web version of this newsletter and more stories. We’ll see you tomorrow.