Business & Economy

On The Money: Cain withdraws from Fed consideration | Says he didn’t want ‘pay cut’ | Trump sues to block subpoena for financial records | Dems plot next move in Trump tax-return battle

Happy Monday and welcome back to On The Money, where we’re wondering about the financial cost of preparing for the Battle of Winterfell. I’m Sylvan Lane, and here’s your nightly guide to everything affecting your bills, bank account and bottom line. See something I missed? Let me know at slane@digital-release.thehill.com or tweet me @SylvanLane. And if you like your newsletter, you can subscribe to it here: http://bit.ly/1NxxW2N.

Write us with tips, suggestions and news: slane@digital-release.thehill.com, njagoda@digital-release.thehill.com and nelis@digital-release.thehill.com. Follow us on Twitter: @SylvanLane, @NJagoda and @NivElis.

 

THE BIG DEAL–Cain withdraws from Fed consideration: President Trump said Monday that former Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain has withdrawn from consideration to be nominated to the Federal Reserve Board amid GOP senators’ intense opposition.

“My friend Herman Cain, a truly wonderful man, has asked me not to nominate him for a seat on the Federal Reserve Board. I will respect his wishes. Herman is a great American who truly loves our Country!” Trump tweeted.

{mosads}GOP critics of Cain argued he was unfit to serve on the Fed board, due to either past misconduct allegations or his outspoken support for Trump. The Hill’s Jordan Fabian and I remind you how we got here.

 

The timeline:

 

The final straw:

 

Cain denied Monday that he withdrew because of political pressure, but rather because of the money and influence he would lose by working for the central bank. He wrote Monday that while he “did like the idea of serving on the Fed,” he did not want to take “a pay cut” because of “ethical restrictions.”

 

Schumer to Republicans: Now do Moore: Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Monday said Senate Republicans should derail Stephen Moore’s potential nomination to the Federal Reserve Board after successfully quashing Herman Cain’s bid for the central bank.

In a Monday statement, Schumer called on Republicans to block Moore’s potential appointment to the Fed, calling him “equally unqualified, and perhaps more political” than Cain.

Moore is seen as a slightly more viable candidate for the Fed given his extensive ties to Washington Republicans. An economist and commentator, Moore spent several decades with right-leaning groups advocating for conservative economic proposals and political candidates.

But Moore, an opinion contributor for The Hill, has also faced intense criticism across the political spectrum for his close ties to Trump, controversial statements and what detractors call a series of dubious and inconsistent economic views.

Moore’s lengthy record of commentary has also posed obstacles to his confirmation. In a March 2002 column for National Review unearthed Monday by CNN’s KFile, he suggested that women should have no role whatsoever in men’s college basketball.

“Here’s the rule change I propose: No more women refs, no women announcers, no women beer venders, no women anything,” Moore wrote.

 

Schumer gets at an interesting question here: Does Herman Cain’s Fed bid help or hurt Stephen Moore’s? So let’s break it down.

 

LEADING THE DAY

Dems digging into Trump finances post-Mueller: Democrats are pressing forward with their investigations into President Trump’s personal finances well beyond the boundaries of the special counsel probe.

Robert Mueller’s investigation focused on questions of collusion in the 2016 election and potential obstruction of justice.

But Democratic Reps. Maxine Waters and Adam Schiff of California, who chair the House Financial Services and Intelligence committees, respectively, are taking a deeper look at Trump’s business empire, including potential dealings with Russian nationals, for any evidence of financial crimes.

Trump’s attorneys have sought to prevent House Democratic investigators from obtaining his financial records. And Republican lawmakers have dismissed the probe as a partisan fishing expedition to undermine the president.

But Democrats insist the investigation into Trump’s financial history is a crucial component of their oversight over the financial sector, raising concerns about money laundering by Russian nationals. I explain here.

 

READ MORE… How Trump is fighting back: President Trump and his private business are suing House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) to try to block a subpoena requesting financial records from the president’s accountant.

The lawsuit, which was filed Monday, asks a federal court in Washington, D.C., to prevent Cummings from obtaining records from Mazars USA, an accounting firm used by the president and his businesses, arguing congressional Democrats are abusing their subpoena power.

“Democrats are using their new control of congressional committees to investigate every aspect of President Trump’s personal finances, businesses, and even his family,” the suit reads. “Instead of working with the president to pass bipartisan legislation that would actually benefit Americans, House Democrats are singularly obsessed with finding something they can use to damage the President politically.”

 

Dems plot next move in Trump tax-return battle: The Trump administration this week is expected to miss a second deadline for providing President Trump’s tax returns, setting up an almost certain legal battle.

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Richard Neal (D-Mass.) gave the IRS until Tuesday at 5 p.m. to turn over six years of Trump’s tax filings and said he’d consider a failure to comply to be a denial of the request. Neal initially set a deadline of April 10 in an April 3 letter to the IRS, but the administration missed that deadline.

Some Democrats say their next move will likely involve issuing a subpoena for the documents. Administration officials have said the president will not turn over his returns, meaning a subpoena standoff would shift the battleground into the courts. The Hill’s Naomi Jagoda tells us what to expect.

 

GOOD TO KNOW

 

ODDS AND ENDS